![]() | ||
The underground drilling method known as hydraulic fracturing, or “fracking,” has for the first time been definitively linked to contaminants in drinking water. As reported by investigative news site ProPublica, on December 8 the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a draft report revealing that water contamination discovered in Pavilion, Wyoming, is almost certainly caused by fracking.
Frackng involves injecting water, sand and chemicals into the ground to fracture rock and release natural gas, and environmental groups and concerned community residents have long argued that these toxic chemicals can then leach into surrounding drinking water supplies. But definitive studies have been hard to come by. In Wyoming, however, 10 compounds related to fracking were found in residents’ drinking water, including benzene, methane, glycol ethers and alcohols. Benzene was found at 246 micrograms per liter, leagues above allowed concentrations of five micrograms per meter.
ProPublica writes that: “The agency’s findings could be a turning point in the heated national debate about whether contamination from fracking is happening, and are likely to shape how the country regulates and develops natural gas resources in the Marcellus Shale and across the Eastern Appalachian states.”
In light of the findings, a spokesperson for Canada-based Encana Corp., responsible for the wells, has said the data remains inconclusive, but shares of the company’s stock still fell more than 6% following the report’s release.
And despite the company’s denials, The Wall Street Journal reports that Encana “has been providing fresh water to 21 homes in the area since August 2010, when it began meeting with the EPA and state regulators to find a long-term alternative to well water for the area.”
The EPA study followed complaints from residents of Pavilion, Wyoming, who voiced concerns about the way their drinking water smelled and tasted. Coverage of the new findings has noted that Wyoming fracking wells are only 1,220 feet deep, compared to rocks being fracked in Pennsylvania and other spots along the Marcellus Shale, which are thousands of feet deeper than water wells.
But as Amy Mall, senior policy analyst for the Natural Resources Defense Council writes on her blog: “This draft report makes it obvious that there are many factors at play, any one of which can go wrong. Much stronger rules are needed to ensure that well construction standards are stronger and reduce threats to drinking water.”

The tribes need help! We are being targeted for this type of drilling, and our councils are being misinformed without scientific study's on the tribes side, they are all from the drilling companies scientist. Blood Tribe in Alberta Canada and the Blackfeet Tribe in Montana. I am a young female water resource specialist (and tribally enrolled) that no one is listening to. :(
ReplyDeleteThis is a biased report and does not accurately represent the latest fracking process at all. A true and accurate report regarding the materials used, the depth of wells drilled with now regulated fracking should be reported. This process has changed drastically from a serious drilling and fracking issue that happened in WY. ProPublica and ProObama....provide scare tactics so we have to depend on foreign resources. Our environment will not be sacrificed when drilling practices can be regulated by each state and not the federal EPA. The Feds would regulate it so nothing would be accomplished but their high wages.
ReplyDeleteLyla Frasier
EPA says fears about fracking moratorium unfounded
ReplyDeleteStory
Discussion
By JENNY MICHAEL | Bismarck Tribune | Posted: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:00 pm | (22) Comments
Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size
The Environmental Protection Agency said fears a moratorium will be placed on hydraulic fracturing are unfounded.
The agency is in the process of conducting a congressionally-ordered study of hydraulic fracturing, also known as "fracking." Hydraulic fracturing is used to retrieve natural gas and oil and is widely used in North Dakota's oil fields. Pressurized fluids, which can include small amounts of diesel, are forced into fractures to extract the wanted substances.
Separately, the EPA plans to issue guidelines for states such as North Dakota to issue permits for use of hydraulic fracturing involving diesel. The EPA has authority under the federal Safe Drinking Water Act to make sure hydraulic fracturing operations do not pollute drinking waters when diesel fuels are used in the processes, the agency said.
"The guidance document is not intended to be a regulatory document and would not itself require any state to change its regulations," Jim Martin, EPA's regional administrator in Denver. said in a statement to the Tribune. "In fact, it is based on existing best practices in use by the industry today."
The issue of the EPA's study has been a point of discussion in North Dakota for some time. In early November, legislators included $1 million in a disaster relief bill to allow the state Industrial Commission to join lawsuits involving potential EPA regulation of hydraulic fracturing.
In comments to the Tribune for a story that ran Sunday, Lynn Helms, director of the Department of Mineral Resources, indicated it was possible the EPA could put a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing as soon as January. However, Helms since has said he was not predicting that as an outcome.
Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said in a statement Tuesday the EPA has clarified it will not put a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing. Hoeven arranged a conference call Tuesday with EPA officials, in which the agency said it will provide a process for the state of North Dakota to comment on the guidelines before they are finalized. The state will continue as the primary regulator of hydraulic fracturing.
Cynthia Dougherty, EPA's director of the Office of Ground Water and Drinking Water, said in the call that the agency is working on a definition of diesel. Martin, in his statement to the Tribune, said the EPA will provide additional opportunities for states, the public and other stakeholders to comment on its draft guidance as soon as it is ready.
"The American people do not have to choose between securing an available energy resource and protecting its drinking water from pollution," his statement said. "They can have and deserve both."
Reach reporter Jenny Michael at 250-8225 or jenny.michael@bismarcktribune.com.
Read more: http://bismarcktribune.com/news/state-and-regional/epa-says-fears-about-fracking-moratorium-unfounded/article_8a72ba30-1ae3-11e1-a738-001cc4c03286.html#ixzz1gqytsG7z
Willistonwire@willsitonnd.com
Lyla Frasier